DeepSeek-V4-Flash (2026-07-31)

Language DeepSeek Partly verified Released Jul 31, 2026
  • In Input modalities: Text Out Output modalities: Text
  • Reasoning· low, high, max
  • Tool use
  • Structured output
  • Open weights

Prices

9 offerings · prices as listed
Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (opens in a new tab) Official Available on this channel since Aug 1, 2026 Global · US · USD Max output: 393.22KMax thinking budget: 393.22K deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Conditions/ 1M tokensInputOutput
Peak hours Standard $0.424$1.272
Off-peak hours $0.212$0.636

Prices from Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing (opens in a new tab) (checked Nov 2, 2026)

Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (opens in a new tab) Official Available on this channel since Aug 1, 2026 China · CNY deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Conditions/ 1M tokensInputOutput
Standard ¥3.00¥9.00
Off-peak hours ¥1.50¥4.50

Prices from 阿里云百炼:模型价格 (opens in a new tab) (checked Nov 2, 2026)

Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (opens in a new tab) Official Available on this channel since Aug 1, 2026 International · Japan · USD Max output: 393.22KMax thinking budget: 393.22K deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Conditions/ 1M tokensInputOutput
Peak hours Standard $0.44$1.32
Off-peak hours $0.22$0.66

Prices from Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing (opens in a new tab) (checked Nov 2, 2026)

Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (opens in a new tab) Official Available on this channel since Aug 1, 2026 Germany (global scope) · US (global scope) · Japan (global scope) · USD Max output: 393.22KMax thinking budget: 393.22K deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Conditions/ 1M tokensInputOutput
Peak hours no longer listed since Oct 23, 2026 $0.424$1.272
Off-peak hours no longer listed since Oct 23, 2026 $0.212$0.636

Prices from Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing (opens in a new tab) (checked Nov 2, 2026)

Standard: the price a request with no conditions pays (the headline price elsewhere on the site).

Details

Knowledge cutoff
May 2025
Licence
MIT
Family
deepseek-flash
Model ID

Not stated on DeepSeek’s pages: max input, reasoning can be off, max thinking budget, built-in tools, aliases.

  • Parameters 304.2B
  • Active 33.6B (estimated) · 256 experts, 6 per token
  • Native precision FP8
  • Layers 43
  • KV cache per token 86 KB
  • Config positions 1024K (config.json max_position_embeddings)
  • API context 977K (maker’s API)
My hardware GeForce RTX 4090 24 GB · 1008 GB/s · 64 GB DDR5 dual channel · 89.6 GB/s
On your hardware · GeForce RTX 4090
Doesn’t fit IQ4_XS (automatic) 8K context
WeightsKV cacheOverheadUsable
Needs
≈ 158.7 GB (weights 150.5 + KV cache 0.7 + overhead 7.5)
Usable
21.6 GB (90% of its memory)
Try
IQ2_XXS runs (needs system memory), but below 4 bits quality drops noticeably
PrecisionWeightsNeeds at 8KOn your hardwareLongest context
FP8 (native)maker’s file155.4 GB≈ 163.9Doesn’t fit—
Q6_K232.7 GB≈ 245.0Doesn’t fit—
Q5_K_M201.5 GB≈ 212.2Doesn’t fit—
Q5_0194.8 GB≈ 205.2Doesn’t fit—
Q4_K_M172.1 GB≈ 181.4Doesn’t fit—
Q4_0159.4 GB≈ 168.0Doesn’t fit—
IQ4_XS150.5 GB≈ 158.7Doesn’t fit—
Q3_K_Mquality drops138.5 GB≈ 146.1Doesn’t fit—
IQ3_XXSquality drops108.4 GB≈ 114.4Doesn’t fit—
Q2_Kquality drops106.2 GB≈ 112.2Doesn’t fit—
IQ2_XXSquality drops72.9 GB≈ 77.3Needs system memory 7–10 tok/s—

Click a row to choose a precision. “Maker’s file” sizes are the maker’s own files; others are parameters × bits per weight.

Compared with other hardware

Each at the highest precision it runs. Click one for details.

Smallest that runs it (Q4_K_M, 8K): no single listed GPU; unified memory Apple M5 Ultra (64-core GPU) · 256 GB.

Run commands

The maker publishes no files at this precision. Choose its native precision or one of its own builds, or quantise it yourself with llama.cpp.

Memory to fine-tune
Full≈ 4535.1 GBDoesn’t fit your hardware
LoRA≈ 569.9 GBDoesn’t fit your hardware
QLoRA≈ 162.6 GBDoesn’t fit your hardware

Batch 1, 2,048-token sequences, gradient checkpointing; LoRA and QLoRA train rank-16 adapters on the attention projections.

Estimates; facts from the maker’s Hugging Face repositories, as of 2026-11-06. How it’s estimated

Cited scores

From third-party leaderboards, not measured by us
  • Epoch Capabilities Index 154.3

    #48 of 118 listed models · CI 152.6–156.3

  • Epoch AI · Chess Puzzles 32%

    #47 of 85 listed models · max effort · ±4.69

  • Epoch AI · FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 24.4%

    #42 of 65 listed models · max effort · ±6.79

  • Epoch AI · FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 57.5%

    #43 of 84 listed models · max effort · ±2.93

  • Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks'. Licensed CC BY 4.0. · License · as of Oct 28 – Nov 5, 2026
  • EQ-Bench by Samuel J. Paech (eqbench.com; EQ-bench/EQ-bench-site on GitHub), MIT License. · License · as of Oct 28, 2026
  • LiveBench (White et al.), release 2026-06-25, livebench.ai, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. This board, adapted from it, is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0. · License · as of Jun 25, 2026
  • changes we made
  1. New language model
  2. Removed from the directory

Sources

DeepSeek’s official policies: data use, privacy, terms →

Some values on this page are still waiting to be checked against official pages: a filled dot is verified, a hollow one is not yet (with or without a source on file). How we verify data

DeepSeek · China · deepseek.com

Snapshots, the same family and other models from this provider