HappyHorse 1.0vsWan3.0 Video

Both video models, compared at each maker’s own API list prices. Every figure links to its source.

Where each stands among all scored models

Each line runs from the lowest to the highest score on the board; the tick is the median.

LMArena Text-to-Video#6 vs #3 of 20Wan3.0 Video: 1,476HappyHorse 1.0: 1,427LMArena Image-to-Video#6 vs #3 of 18Wan3.0 Video: 1,480HappyHorse 1.0: 1,442LMArena Video Edit#6 vs #1 of 7Wan3.0 Video: 1,414HappyHorse 1.0: 1,307
  • HappyHorse 1.0
  • Wan3.0 Video

Key differences

Input modalities
Text, Image happyhorse-1.0-i2v · as of Nov 3, 2026
Text, Image, Audio, Video wan3.0-video · as of Nov 3, 2026

These differences use verified vendor specifications or each maker’s official API on the same region, currency, meter and billing conditions. Different conditions remain side by side in the full table; they do not establish which model is cheaper. Declared features describe support, not measured quality or a recommendation. Missing evidence does not mean a feature is unsupported.

Full comparison

HappyHorse 1.0 Alibaba Qwen Wan3.0 Video Alibaba Qwen
Overview
ReleasedApr 28, 2026 Aug 6, 2026
Specs
Input modalitiesText, Image Text, Image, Audio, Video
Max length15s 30s
Resolutions720p, 1080p 480p, 720p, 1080p
Native audioYes Yes
Image to videoYes Yes
Pricing
Price per second$0.30Also priced under other conditions: 720p1080p $0.165025Also priced under other conditions: 480p, 720p1080p
Cited scores
LMArena Text-to-Video1,427 1,476
LMArena Image-to-Video1,442 1,480

Headline prices may come from different channels, regions or tiers. Check each source before choosing a model; missing facts stay blank.

Model details and sources

Cited scores